Most Active Stories
- CFCC's Humanities and Fine Arts Center Partnering with DPAC, Carolina Theatre, and Local Arts Venues
- Wilmington Family YMCA Changes Background Check Policy for Volunteers After Gallagher's Arrest
- BOEM says Shrinking Buffer Zone for Offshore Oil and Gas Not Possible
- Cape Fear Chordsmen are Going to the Dawgs
- NC Legislature Considers Foster Care Family Act
Thu December 15, 2011
Military Tuition Assistance Rules May Limit Options
Federal money for active duty students is particularly attractive to for-profit schools, which have been signing up members of the services in record numbers.
So, the Pentagon has developed new rules to ensure that service members are treated fairly when they use government money to attend college. Those rules are set to go into effect Jan. 1, but many of the nation's best-known schools say they cannot accept those requirements.
The dispute puts at risk millions of dollars in federal assistance.
At a hearing in September, Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) said colleges need to provide more information, so these students know what kind of school they are attending, and whether they can succeed there.
"Total cost of program, transfer ability of credits, default rates, graduation rates, job placement rates upon graduation, are a few ways to ensure transparency," he said.
The Defense Department says, they've been listening, and they're cracking down.
Starting in January, schools will have to sign a special memorandum before they can receive what's known as "tuition assistance" for active military. Schools must charge military and civilian students the same tuition. They have to give students a clear education plan. And, they have to try to give students academic credit for some of their military training.
That last point raised eyebrows at places like the University of California, where Lawrence Pitts is provost.
"UC has a very careful process for reviewing courses taken outside of UC," Pitt says.
He cannot promise in advance that UC campuses will give credit for military training, as those schools want to review training courses one-by-one.
So, like other prestigious public and private universities says, UC will not sign that memorandum.
"If we did that on a regular basis we would have a number of students ill-prepared and not be able to take full advantage of university education at UC," Pitts says.
Many for profit schools, however, have signed up. They say this shows they are more in tune with the needs of non-traditional students, like those in the service.
Brian Moran of the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities says, his for-profit members are happy to recognize military training.
"It's something that we feel is important to these service members and we embrace seamless transferability of credit in recognition of the experience of active service military as well," Moran says.
The fact that military money might be headed to more for-profit schools is particularly annoying to people like Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA). Harkin's committee has held hearings highlighting what he says are aggressive recruiting practices by for-profit schools, some targeting more than $500 million annually in tuition assistance.
"One has to ask why is it that all the good schools are not signing the memorandum of understanding, and all the bad actors are?" Harkin asks.
The Defense Department would not comment.
Military service groups have been outraged at the idea that students could not use their tuition assistance dollars at hundreds of recognized colleges. They've written to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, asking him to put these new rules on hold. They've been joined by 52 Senators from both parties.
Some colleges say, if the issue isn't resolved, they will try to find money elsewhere, so members of the military can stay in school.